Logo Background RSS

Evacuated Tube Transportation Technology – ET3 (Extended Version)

  • Written by Bovey Tracet Taxis | 25 Comments25 Comments Comments
    Last Updated: November 4th, 2011

    If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

    Related posts:

    1. Technology Coming to Atlanta Taxis
    2. Simple Minds – I Travel (extended)
    3. Alternative Fuels, Green Technology, Hot Niche, HHO Hybrid, Besthybrid
    4. What cheap ways are there to travel on the tube?
    5. Can the eggs travel from ovaries without one fallopian tube?

    Who are teignbridge taxis? Teignbridge taxis are one of the biggest taxi companies in the South West. We have grown steadily over the last few years because we base our business on offering a reliable great value for money service. Our office is based in Newton Abbot and you can contact us 24-7 on 01626 333 333. ,Why Should You Use Teignbridge taxis? If you are looking for a great service that is reliable you will use us. Our customers are our priority and we go the extra mile to see that your happy.
    What services do we offer? We do normal taxi services as well as wedding cars, airport transfers, wheel chair access cars as well as having a range of 4,5,6-8 seater vehicles that you can book.
    What cars do we have available? Here are a list of our available 4 Seater cars; Ford Mondeo Saloon, Ford Mondeo Estate, Mercedes E-class, Volvo S40, Nissan Tino Our 5 Seaters; Citroen Dispatch,Fiat Scudo Our 6 Seaters; Ford Galaxy, Seat Alhambra And 8 Seaters; Ford Toureno, Mercedes V-Class ,Customer satisfaction is of the utmost importance to us because we build our business on your good feedback. If you want to see more click this link........,
    widdicombe in moor taxis

25 Comments

  1. #1
    MrAapenkind
    November 4th, 2011 at 3:43 am

    i hate shell so mutch

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  2. #2
    superdiza
    November 4th, 2011 at 4:26 am

    @AlienScientist
    Could you please upload higher resolution videos, so that the attached imagery can be read if so titled?

    thanks.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  3. #3
    foxyroxytm
    November 4th, 2011 at 5:08 am

    This idea is so cool.
    Say yes to a Type 1 civilization!

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  4. #4
    omfugger
    November 4th, 2011 at 5:43 am

    22 people must of been the elite

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  5. #5
    MrSkittleBiscuit
    November 4th, 2011 at 6:27 am

    @babygirl91580 America is retarted. But nowadays, anny country that I would want to live in the retarted too. just watch, china is gonna make this first cuz america is too obsessed with the the Obama AdSHITistration.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  6. #6
    babygirl91580
    November 4th, 2011 at 6:38 am

    @MrSkittleBiscuit or maybe they will come up with ideas on having like multiple tubes that go different speeds, that would be cool. i just really hate flying but i really feel america has dropped the ball, they have trains in japan that go over 200 mph, i think their names is Maglev train, but they are supper fast and the US should have been started this and using the technology, instead of depending on oil. SMH

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  7. #7
    MrSkittleBiscuit
    November 4th, 2011 at 7:18 am

    @babygirl91580 Yeah, Planes won’t become extinct, but they wont be the main form of transport anymore. I personally feel much more safe in an airplane because if the engine stops, the plane can glide down. If a pipe bend on this. Boom.Dead. lol hate to be grusome but yeah tht why im scared cuz of thatspeed

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  8. #8
    babygirl91580
    November 4th, 2011 at 7:26 am

    @MrSkittleBiscuit well i hate flying so i would be all for this idea, i cant stand flying and have a fear of being that far from the ground, with a fear of flying and im in the usa, places like japan, china france, are impossible for me to get too, so this would be perfect for people like me :) , but i wonder, people would probly still have to fly to places like hawaii

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  9. #9
    MrSkittleBiscuit
    November 4th, 2011 at 7:55 am

    @babygirl91580 They said that they could have them up within 30 years, so if it goes through, we’ll be able to ride them. But anyway, I see point about the terrorism, but 4000mph just scares the shit out of me lol i dont care how safe it is

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  10. #10
    babygirl91580
    November 4th, 2011 at 8:06 am

    @MrSkittleBiscuit terrorism is a problem with all our ways of transport, planes, cars trains, ect, does that mean we should stop flying and driving and traveling, no. im all for this idea, and would feel alot safer traveling this way than on a plane and a car. im all for stopping the fact that we depend on oil. as far as the ice sheet, i have no clue to a solution for that, lol but i think even if they just use this to get around the country would be great , gosh i wished we lived longer

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  11. #11
    dudewithopinion
    November 4th, 2011 at 8:33 am

    Do all future buildings look like a pair of tits?

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  12. #12
    ChantFox
    November 4th, 2011 at 8:56 am

    @JP05CPSN I had tought about how species evolved acording to Darwins theory even before I had heard about it, I used my creativity and when I learned about Darwin I was appalled on how it matched and learned how I wasnt so insignificant as I thought I could be.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  13. #13
    tk200895
    November 4th, 2011 at 9:07 am

    What about monetry and currency, can`t it help unifying world currency

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  14. #14
    MrSkittleBiscuit
    November 4th, 2011 at 9:09 am

    @MrSkittleBiscuit 4000*

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  15. #15
    MrSkittleBiscuit
    November 4th, 2011 at 9:32 am

    I personally think that people in general would be sacred to go 4,00 miles per hour. Terrorism is also a problem. Blow a tube up and the you have capsules being spit out at 4,000 miles per hour onto land. Also, building a bridge from Alaska to Russia is almost impossible due the the Ice sheets underneath. One day, if we can eliminate terrorism and build this bridge, this could be a good idea. I think for now, we should just make green airplanes. Put solar panels on the roofs They go above clouds

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  16. #16
    MaoClausewitz
    November 4th, 2011 at 9:45 am

    Got a naive question since I’m not a scientist. Is there a way to reduce the original mass of an object, so the force is reduced when accelerating? I think I can just remember that mass is associated with an higgs-field, but I’m not sure about that. Thanks Alien!

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  17. #17
    vonbryce
    November 4th, 2011 at 10:41 am

    @AlienScientist re:atell77 Do the unit analysis, brah.
    (v^2/r) = [ (m/s)^2 / m ] = [ m^2 / m s^2 ] = [ m/s^2 ], or meter per second per second, same as acceleration.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  18. #18
    TheUnchainedMind
    November 4th, 2011 at 11:41 am

    Great video.
    This technology would be fantastic to have.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  19. #19
    ronmann606
    November 4th, 2011 at 12:36 pm

    terrorists would love to blow that shit up

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  20. #20
    zevkirsh
    November 4th, 2011 at 1:29 pm

    godamn thank you. you don’t need to believe in alarmist global warming in order to be against fossil fuel. fossil fuel is obvious shitty and the motive to replace it does NOT need to be fear of alarmist collapse, so much as the obvious desire to move beyond limited capacities.
    et3 is a good example of futurist desires for progress having nothing to do with alarmism but just obvious desire for progress.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  21. #21
    0tubeman
    November 4th, 2011 at 1:40 pm

    Nice Video. Princeton Physicist Gerard K. O’Neill wrote eloquently about this concept in his excellent book 2081…in 1981. O’Neill’s Space Studies Institute built magnetic lunar launchers called Mass Drivers and improved their acceleration from 33g’s to more than 1,800 g’s….obviously much more than would be needed for this technology..which O’Neill called “floater” technology. The only real drawback to these systems is the very large capital cost of construction.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  22. #22
    TStarHD
    November 4th, 2011 at 2:30 pm

    @TheOhsnapppp omg jabar -.- as if you watch this!

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  23. #23
    TheOhsnapppp
    November 4th, 2011 at 3:09 pm

    wheres the sign up button .

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  24. #24
    superdiza
    November 4th, 2011 at 3:54 pm

    You should really take a breath of air between subjects.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  25. #25
    lovinit19791
    November 4th, 2011 at 4:20 pm

    How do you go about maintaining the capsules, track and inner pipes if its under vacuum? If theres only the one pipe as depicted in the video maintenance would shut the whole system down every time it required it.

    This will not replace cars…with a car you can go where you want…to the door. In this you will only be able to go to where it passes…so we will still require other forms of transport…i think most would just stick t their cars.

    Post ReplyPost Reply

Leave a Comment

Security Code: